Thread:DevilSlayer123/@comment-862718-20200129113255/@comment-862718-20200207032520

DevilSlayer123 wrote: To be fair no matter how many times they tried to explain it there were still people going against their requests about keeping the page how it was and just continued messing around with Nagi's page. If people were continuing to change Nagi's page to reflect that they are a transwoman then, again, I'm starting to think that the problem is less them and more your admins digging their heels in and trying to justify decisions that go completely against the typical fandom and Wiki standards and seem to be unique to here. Locking the page wasn't the problem. Choosing WHAT to leave the page saying when you locked it was the problem, especially when you continue to justify it in ways that, from a purely analytical perspective and not viewing them in a vacuum but as a part of a greater whole, really don't paint your Wiki in a positive light. Something that is shown by the continued complaints and questions about your Nagi article.