Thread:DevilSlayer123/@comment-862718-20200129113255/@comment-862718-20200207025757

AP24 wrote: First of all the information on TV Trope, MyAnimelist and Wikipedia are put by fans, especially English-speaking people. This is a Japanese series written by a Japanese author. The Japanese tend to still use male pronouns even if they know the identity of the person in question is female. When the author had to use gender-specific pronouns when referring to Alice in the text, he chose to use male pronouns. The purpose of this wiki is to provide information from the series in neutral standpoint, primarily using the Japanese text as source. We are following the Japanese text and put information here like a robot. So please respect our decision, we don't like arguing the same thing over and over again. Again, you are choosing to do this when no other Wiki does so. And, again, I have above stated that your reasons seem to stem from personal bias judging from the transphobic words your founder stated on Nagi's article's Talk page. Nagi fits all the cultural standards of a transwoman in Japan. To say you refuse to acknowledge Nagi is a transwoman because of neutral translation when every other Wiki and source out there, for EVERY trans character, uses a proper cultural conversion, not only speaks of personal bias leaking into your decision (again, supported by the words of your founder in Nagi's article's Talk page), but also makes you look VERY bad in the eyes of the community, since you're the only Wiki in existence, and the only source of information on Rakudai, choosing to do this.

I'm still waiting on a response from DevilSlayer, but as it stands, if I don't get it soon, I'm going to have to start writing my article. Unfortunately, as it stands, while I will be maintaining neutrality in my reporting and giving the views of both sides, it's still not going to look favorably on all of you due to the VERY poor reasoning behind your decision and how you seem to be the ONLY Wiki in existence using this reasoning. Which, once again, along with the comments of your founder on Nagi's article's Talk page, suggests personal bias and that the reasoning of neutral machine translation is more just an excuse to cover up this bias. Intentional or not, that's what it looks like, and I can't exactly refute it in my article.